EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF SODA ON FLOWABLE BULK-FILL COMPOSITE RESIN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH

Authors

  • Cindy Nathania Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti
  • Rosita Stefani Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti
  • Eddy Department of Dental Material, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti
  • Steward Hadi Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.eprodenta.2024.008.02.7

Keywords:

Compressive Strength, Dental Materials, Flowable Bulk-Fill Composite Resin, pH, Soda

Abstract

Background: Flowable bulk-fill composite resin is a direct restoration material and has gained popularity in restorative dentistry for class II restoration. Soda is one of the most consumed drinks by the public and is known to be acidic. Objective: To determine the effect of soda on the compressive strength of flowable bulk-fill composite resin. Methods: This study used 54 cylindrical (diameter: 2 mm; height: 4 mm) flowable bulk-fill composite resin samples of different brands (Beautifil Bulk Flowable, SDR Flow+, Tetric N-Flow Bulk Fill). The samples were divided into 3 control groups and 3 experimental groups. After all groups had been incubated for 24 hours, the control groups were soaked in artificial saliva for 6 days. The experimental groups were soaked in soda for 6 hours, and then for 18 hours in artificial saliva. The solutions were replaced every day, and the pH was measured. The study is performed at a controlled temperature in an incubator at 37°C. After the samples were dried, the compressive strengths of the samples were tested using the Universal Testing Machine. Results: Based on the Two-Way ANOVA test, the compressive strength values between groups of flowable bulk-fill composite resins are not significantly different (p > 0.05). Conclusion : The immersion in soda does not significantly affect the compressive strength of flowable bulk-fill composite resin. Flowable bulk-fill composite resin exhibits relatively high resistance to acidic solutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Strini BS, Marques JF de L, Pereira R, Sobral-Souza DF, Pecorari VGA, Liporoni PCS, et al. Comparative evaluation of bulk-fill composite resins: knoop microhardness, diametral tensile strength, and degree of conversion. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022;14:225–33.

Islam MS, Nassar M, Elsayed MA, Jameel DB, Ahmad TT, Rahman MM. In vitro optical and physical stability of resin composite materials with different filler characteristics. Polymers (Basel). 2023 Apr 29;15(9):2121.

Kelić K. Microhardness of bulk-fill composite materials. Acta Clin Croat. 2016;55(4):607–15.

Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon P. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J. 2017 Mar 10;222(5):337–44.

Permana DP, Sujatmiko B, Yulianti R. Perbandingan tingkat kebocoran mikro resin komposit bulk-fill dengan teknik penumpatan oblique incremental dan bulk. Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Indonesia. 2016 Dec 30;2(3):135.

Eichler E, Vach K, Schlueter N, Jacker-Guhr S, Luehrs AK. Dentin adhesion of bulk-fill composites and universal adhesives in class I-cavities with high C-factor. J Dent. 2024 Jan;104852.

Gerula-Szymańska A, Kaczor K, Lewusz-Butkiewicz K, Nowicka A. Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class II restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater J. 2020 May 27;39(3):335–44.

Gupta R, Tomer AK, Kumari A, Mullick S, Dubey S. Bulkfill flowable composite resins – A review . International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences. 2017;3(2):38–40.

Baroudi K. Flowable resin composites: a systematic review and clinical considerations. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research. 2015;9(6):ZE18–24.

Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, et al. Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan 24;08(01):001–8.

Christiawan KA, Ratnasari D. The effect of immersion in soda containing sucrose and aspartame on the compressive strength of bulk-fill composite resin. Journal of Indonesian Dental Association [Internet]. 2022 May 17;5(1):39. Available from: http://jurnal.pdgi.or.id/index.php/jida/article/view/767

Reddy A, Norris DF, Momeni SS, Waldo B, Ruby JD. The pH of beverages in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Apr;147(4):255–63.

Namineni S, Satish V, Prabhakar A, Devi C Maganur P. Effect of soft drinks and fresh fruit juice on surface roughness of commonly used restorative materials. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Apr;8(1):1–5.

Reddy PS, Tejaswi KS, Shetty S, Annapoorna B, Pujari SC, Thippeswamy H. Effects of commonly consumed beverages on surface roughness and color stability of the nano, microhybrid and hybrid composite resins: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Aug;14(4):718–23.

Szalewski L, Wójcik D, Bogucki M, Szkutnik J, Różyło-Kalinowska I. The influence of popular beverages on mechanical properties of composite resins. Materials. 2021 Jun 5;14(11):3097.

Sakaguchi R, Ferracane J, Powers J. Craig’s restorative dental materials, fourteenth edition. 14th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2019.

Galvão MR, Caldas SGFR, Calabrez-Filho S, Campos EA, Bagnato VS, Rastelli ANS, et al. Compressive strength of dental composites photo-activated with different light tips. Laser Phys. 2013 Apr 1;23(4):045604.

Alp CK, Gündogdu C, Ahısha CD. The effect of gastric acid on the surface properties of different universal composites: a SEM study. Scanning. 2022 Dec 28;2022:1–10.

Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Sokolowski J, Kleczewska J, Bociong K. Ageing of dental composites based on methacrylate resins—a critical review of the causes and method of assessment. Polymers (Basel). 2020 Apr 10;12(4):882.

Ugurlu M, Sari F. A 3-year retrospective study of clinical durability of bulk-filled resin composite restorations. Restor Dent Endod. 2022 Dec 3;47(1):e5.

Condò R, Cerroni L, Pasquantonio G, Mancini M, Pecora A, Convertino A, et al. A deep morphological characterization and comparison of different dental restorative materials. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–16.

Pimentel ES, França FMG, Turssi CP, Basting RT, Vieira-Junior WF. Effects of in vitro erosion on surface texture, microhardness, and color stability of resin composite with S-PRG fillers. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Mar 30;27(7):3545–56.

Kundie F, Azhari CH, Muchtar A, Ahmad ZA. Effects of filler size on the mechanical properties of polymer-filled dental composites: a review of recent developments. Journal of Physical Science. 2018 May 25;29(1):141–65.

Sadananda V, Bhat G, Hegde M. Comparative evaluation of flexural and compressive strengths of bulk-fill composites. International Journal of Advanced Scientific and Technical Research. 2017 Feb;1(7).

Lempel E, Czibulya Z, Kovács B, Szalma J, Tóth Á, Kunsági-Máté S, et al. Degree of conversion and BisGMA, TEGDMA, UDMA elution from flowable bulk fill composites. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 May 20;17(5):732.

Guo X, Yu Y, Gao S, Zhang Z, Zhao H. Biodegradation of dental resin-based composite—a potential factor affecting the bonding effect: a narrative review. Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 18;10(9):2313.

Cho K, Rajan G, Farrar P, Prentice L, Prusty BG. Dental resin composites: a review on materials to product realizations. Compos B Eng. 2022 Feb;230:109495.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Nathania, C., Stefani, R., Eddy, & Hadi, S. (2024). EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF SODA ON FLOWABLE BULK-FILL COMPOSITE RESIN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH. E-Prodenta Journal of Dentistry, 8(2), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.eprodenta.2024.008.02.7

Issue

Section

Articles