PERBEDAAN KEKUATAN TEKAN RESIN KOMPOSIT NANOFILLER PADA PERENDAMAN OBAT KUMUR BERALKOHOL DAN NON ALKOHOL
Keywords:
resin komposit nanofiller, kekuatan tekan, obat kumur beralkohol, obat kumur non alkohol, universal testing machineAbstract
Resin komposit merupakan bahan restorasi dalam bidang kedokteran gigi yang berguna untuk mengembalikan struktur gigi yang hilang. Salah satu jenis resin komposit yang berkembang saat ini adalah resin komposit nanofiller, yang memiliki sifat fisik yang lebih baik dan sifat mekanis berupa kekuatan tekan yang kuat. Kerapkali para pengguna resin komposit nanofiller juga merupakan para pengguna obat kumur, baik obat kumur beralkohol maupun non alkohol. Obat kumur merupakan bahan yang sering digunakan untuk pemeliharaan kebersihan rongga mulut sehari-hari. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan kekuatan tekan resin komposit nanofiller setelah direndam dalam obat kumur beralkohol dan non alkohol. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah post test only group design. Sampel yang digunakan berbentuk silindris, diameter 4 mm dan tinggi 6 mm, dibuat 30 sampel dan dibagi dalam 3 kelompok perendaman selama 12 jam, yaitu kelompok perendaman I sebagai kelompok kontrol perendaman dalam larutan akuades, kelompok II perendaman dalam larutan obat kumur beralkohol (kandungan alkohol 21,6%), dan kelompok III perendaman dalam larutan obat kumur non alkohol (kandungan alkohol 0%). Kekuatan tekan seluruh sampel di ukur dengan menggunakan universal testing machine dan hasil uji One-Way Anova menunjukkan nilai signifikansi <0,05. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat perbedaan kekuatan tekan resin komposit nanofiller setelah dilakukan perendaman pada obat kumur beralkohol dan obat kumur non alkohol, dengan nilai terendah dimiliki oleh kelompok II yaitu perendaman dalam obat kumur beralkohol.
References
Anusavice, K.J., 2013. Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials, 12th ed, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders, pp : 275-306.
Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. 2012. Craig’s Restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 91, 143, 162.
Kaur P, Luthra R, Puneet. 2011. Nanocomposites- A Step Towards Improved Restorative Dentistry. Indian Journal Of Dental Sciences; 3(1): 3-15.
Permatasari R, Usman M. 2008. Penutupan Diastema Dengan Menggunakan Komposit Nanofiller. Indonesian Journal Of Dentistry; 15(3): 239-246.
Khan AA, Siddiqui AZ, Mohsin SF, Al-Kheraif AA. 2015. Influence of mouth rinses on the surface hardness of dental resin nano-composite. Pak J Med; 14859.
Pintauli S, Hamada T. Menuju gigi & mulut sehat pencegahan dan pemeliharaan. Medan: USU Press, 2008: 4-18.
Nirwana SB, Sofiani E. 2019. Efektifitas waktu perendaman dalam larutan obat kumur beralkohol terhadap perubahan warna pada tumpatan resin komposit flowable. Tesis. Karya Tulis Ilmiah; 1-12.
Price R. B., Doyle G., Murphy D., 2000. Effect of Composite Thickness on the Shear Bond Strength to Dentin, J Can Dent Assoc., 66: 35-9.
Ugur E, Esra Y, Meltem ME, Sevda O. 2013. Surface hardness evaluation of different composite resin materials: influence of sports and energy drinks immersion after a short-term period. J. Appl. Oral Sci; vol.21 no.2 Bauru Mar.
Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. 2000. In Vivo Degradation of Resin-Dentin Bonds in Humans Over 1 to 3 Years. J Dent Res; 79(6):1385-1391.
Davaloo R, Tavangar M, Darabi F, Pourhabibi Z, Alamouti NA. 2013. The surface hardness value of a light cured hybrid composite resin after 12 hours immersion in three alcohol-free mouthwashes. J Dentomax Rad Path Surg; 2 (4): 1-6.
Miranda DD, Dos Santos BCE, Baggio AFH, Nunes LDA, Lovadino JR. 2011. Effect of mouthwash on knoop hardness and surface roughness of dental composites after different immersion times. Braz Oral Res; 25(2): 168-73.
Sevimey M, Aykent F, Ozturk N, Cokuk N, Yucel T. 2008. Effect of Mouthrinses on Color Stability of Provisional Restorative Materials. Research. Konya, Turkey: Selcuk University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics; 2-11.
Ferracane,J.L. 2006. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dental Materials.22(3): 211-222.
Tsitrou E, Kelogrigoris S, Koulaouzidou E, Antoniades-Halvatjoglou M, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Van Noort R. 2014. Effect of Extraction Media and Storage Time on the Elution of Monomers from Four Contemporary Resin Composite Materials. Toxicology International Journal. Jan-Apr; 21(1): 89-95
Curtis RV, Watson TF. 2014. Dental Biomaterials: Imaging, Testing and Modelling. Woodhead Publishing. Cambridge: 112-152.
Karabela MM, Sideridou ID. 2008. Effect of the structure of silane coupling agent on sorption characteristics of solvents by dental resin nanocomposites. Dent Mat; 24: 1631-9.
Hegde MN, Hegde P. Bhandary S, Deepika K. 2015. An Evolution of Compressive Strength of Newer Nanocomposite: An In Vitro Study. British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research; 9: 1096-1104.
Yusuf F, Srirekha A, Hegde J, Karale R, Bashetty K, Adiga S. 2013. Effect of alcoholic and non alcoholic beverages on the wear and fracture toughness of teeth and resin composite materials. J Res Dent; 1 (1): 11-7.
Ateyah NZ. 2005. The effect of different mouth rinses on microhardness of tooth-coloured restorative materials. J Pak Dent Assoc; 14: 150-3.
Eliades G, Eliades T, Brantley WA, Watts DC. 2003. Dental materials in vivo aging and related phenomena. 1st ed., Hong Kong: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc:118-20.
De Moraes Porto IC, das Neves LE, de Souza CK, Parolia A, Barbosa dos Santos N. 2014. A comparative effect of mouthwashes with different alcohol concentration on surface hardness, sorption and solubility of composite resin. OHDM;13(2): 502-6
Martin, N., Jedynakiewiz, N.M., Fisher, A.C. 2003. Hygroscopic Expansion and Solubility of Composite Restoratives, Dent Mater, 19:77-86.
Sideridou,I.,Tserki,V.,Papanastasiou,G. 2003. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of lightcured dimethacrylate-based dental resins .Biomaterials. 24(4): 655-665.
Rismadiar. 2011. Degradasi Bahan Restorasi Resin Komposit. Skripsi Tidak diterbitkan. Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Sumatera Utara
Alia, RN. 2015. Kekerasan Permukaan Resin Komposit Nanohybrid setelah Perendaman dalam Obat Kumur beralkohol 21%. Skripsi.Tidak diterbitkan, Fakutas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Sumatera Utara
Katz Harold. Comparison of Mouthwash to Alcohol-Free Mouthwash. [cited on Sep 22nd 2013]. Available from: http://www.therabreath.com/ compare mouthwash-alcohol-free-mouthwash.html
Haake SK. Etiology of Periodontal Diseases. In: Newman MG, Takei HH, CarranzaFA,eds. Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. 11thEd. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier, 2011:95-98,
Foster JS, Pan PC, Kolenbrander PE. Effects of antimicrobial agents on oral biofilms in a saliva-conditioned flow cell. J Biofilms.. 2004;1(1):5-12.
Al Habanesh R, Qubain TG, Alsalman W, Khader Y. The effect of Listerine mouthwash on dental plaque, gingival inflammation and c- reactiver protein (CRP). Dentristry 2014; 4(2): 1-5.
Sharma N, Charles CH, Lynch MC, QaqishJ, Mcguire JA, Galustians JG, et al. Adjunctive Benefit of an Essential Oil-Cotaining Mouthrinse in Reducing Plaque and Gingivitis in Patient who Brush and Floss Regularly: a Six Month Study. JADA2004;135:496-504.
Santos A. Evidence-based control of plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontal 2003; 20(5): 13-16.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
E-Prodenta Journal of Dentistry receives original texts that have not been published in any media in any language, or are being sent to other journals at the same time. If the manuscript has already been presented in a particular symposium or seminar, then it should be written in the description. The submission of the manuscript shall be accompanied by a statement of authenticity of writing and unpublished statements made and signed by the first author. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
